Anticipate London is part of the Informa Connect Division of Informa PLC
This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 3099067.
For every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction. For example, when it comes to hybrid work, every push for remote flexibility meets a pull towards office mandates. Finding the right approach is no small feat.
Organisations face the challenge of filling empty offices that drain resources. At the same time, they need to tap into the appeal of remote work, which, among other benefits, promises a broader talent pool and caters to the preferences of the incoming workforce.
Striking the right balance between in-office and remote work is a complex task. Trends like coffee badging, hushed hybrid and the decline of hot desking add to the complexity. However, these trends can also help us find the way forward. By examining them, we can uncover the underlying dynamics of hybrid work and learn how to separate fact from fiction.
In 2023, a report found that more than half of US workers admitted to making only very brief appearances in the office to fulfil attendance requirements. This trend, known as coffee badging, involves employees grabbing a cup of coffee, maybe chatting with a few co-workers and then quietly slipping out to work remotely for the rest of the day.
A year later, coffee badging has become a clever way to meet hybrid work policies without genuinely engaging with in-office activities. While the practice is real, it reflects a deeper issue of disconnect between corporate mandates and employee preferences. The fact that employees are showing up only briefly to avoid penalties highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to hybrid work policies.
For example, Amazon is trying to combat coffee badging by requiring minimum hours of attendance, varying from two to six hours. But contrary to the original intention, this has added confusion and led to stronger pushback from employees, who find the policy non-transparent and overly rigid.
To effectively address coffee badging, employers can use reliable occupancy data that tracks not just presence but actual engagement and productivity within the office. This could involve using non-intrusive methods such as aggregated data from badge swipes, workspace bookings and voluntary check-ins, rather than constant surveillance. For example, employees might swipe their badges upon entry and exit, book meeting rooms or desks as needed and use digital tools to log their participation in collaborative projects.
By analysing this data, employers can develop targeted policies to encourage meaningful office presence rather than superficial compliance. This might include offering more flexible scheduling, creating more collaborative spaces or enhancing valued amenities. In this way, focusing on actual engagement enables organisations to find effective interventions that support a productive and satisfying hybrid work environment.
A more recent and subtle form of rebellion against rigid return-to-office policies is the hushed hybrid trend, where managers secretly allow employees to maintain flexible work arrangements despite official mandates.
Dell is a prime example, making headlines as employees and managers quietly defy strict office attendance requirements. Despite introducing penalties for remote staff, such as threats of forgoing promotions and pay raises, internal data revealed that many employees continued to stay home. This indicates that managers are not enforcing these new policies and are instead silently permitting their teams to continue working remotely.
This hushed hybrid trend reflects a deeper, clandestine battle between employers and staff over the dominance of home working in today’s workforce. Managers, acting as peacekeepers, are permitting teams to work from home to avoid workplace conflicts. And the trend is not unique to Dell. A recent hybrid work survey found that 70 per cent of managers across various companies have chosen not to enforce their company’s office attendance policy.
While managers may keep their team members satisfied in the short term by allowing flexible work arrangements, the wider impact on organisational culture could be detrimental. Organisations could bridge this gap by promoting open communication and using data to develop transparent hybrid work policies. By understanding employee preferences, productivity metrics and actual office usage, leadership teams can create balanced policies that align with both corporate goals and employee wellbeing. This approach would help mitigate the adverse effects of the hushed hybrid trend and nurture a more connected and cohesive work environment.
In recent discussions about hybrid work trends, the proclaimed end of hot desking has gained attention. This set-up, where employees use available workspaces instead of having assigned desks, is being re-evaluated. Some organisations are now moving away from hot desking, believing that offering assigned desks will attract employees back to the office.
However, this approach can be shortsighted. Like parents who find themselves stuck having to bribe their children to comply, companies might find that perks alone, such as dedicated desks, won’t sustain long-term employee satisfaction and attendance.
To truly address employee needs and preferences, organisations should focus on the underlying issues that influence office attendance. Instead of relying on perks, companies can use accurate data on workspace occupancy and employee preferences. This could involve non-intrusive methods such as analysing patterns of space usage and feedback from employee surveys.
For example, tracking which areas of the office are most frequently used and which are often empty can provide insights into how to better configure space and allocate resources. Additionally, regularly gathering feedback through anonymous surveys can help understand employee needs and preferences without invading their privacy.
Understanding the real usage patterns and needs of employees would then help companies create policies that encourage meaningful office presence rather than superficial compliance. By focusing on actual engagement, organisations might find more effective ways to nurture a productive and satisfying hybrid work environment.
Finding the sweet spot between in-office and remote work is undoubtedly complex. However, by understanding the dynamics of hybrid work and using data-driven insights, organisations can create a tailored plan that reflects their unique set of workers and circumstances. This approach involves a few key elements.
First, respect employees. Give them a voice and listen to it. Engage in open dialogue to address concerns and develop policies that reflect mutual understanding. This builds trust and ensures that policies are more likely to be embraced.
Second, rely on accurate data. Collect comprehensive data on occupancy, employee habits and productivity. Review both planned and actual occupancy data to gain clear visibility into workspace use. This helps accurately assess and improve office spaces.
Third, create a workplace that meets employees’ needs. Design flexible workspaces based on their preferences. Provide essential resources, identify congested and underused areas, and improve the layout. Flexible, well-equipped spaces help employees work efficiently and comfortably.
By focusing on these principles, organisations can make hybrid work smoother and more effective. If done right, the issues behind current workplace trends will be fleeting, leaving us with a more engaged and productive workforce.
Karl Breeze, CEO at Matrix Booking